Standardization

Given our discussion on standardized tests, and No Child Left Behind (NCLB), it seems the only part the class could agree on was that this is a political issue.  Our readings presented one strong viewpoint from the negative side.  From my observations, this lead our discussion down a path of more questions than answers. For example, who pays for the test, districts or the state? Are charter schools required to take the test?  Is NCLB a means of weeding out bad teachers and is that a fair assessment?

As future teachers beginning our career we are going to be subject to a world of scrutiny.  Standardized tests are not a shock.  I have both taken them and helped proctor them.  Like it or not, we will have to handle them.  Students need to be measured on some scale, as well as teachers, that they are learning.  Similarly this is an opportunity for students to learn to take future rigorous standardized tests, such as the SAT.  Honestly, I do not want to teach to a test.  I agree that students will not retain information.  So what is the solution? 

First of all, I believe each of us need to approach standardized testing from both sides of the table.  This can only help us ask better questions, instead of becoming a chorus without all the facts.  What are the merits of NCLB, and how can it be altered? What is the alternative to standardized testing to assess students are learning? How can we raise the bar for teachers, so that students are receiving the best quality education?